Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Glorious Company v. Sparkle Fireworks, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00162
Plaintiff:
Glorious Company
Defendant:
Sparkle Fireworks, Inc. , Jerry W. Windham and P. Keith Thurmond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hazlehurst, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP et al v. Copiah County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2011cv00121
Plaintiff:
Hazlehurst, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP and Nanette Thurmond-Smith
Defendant:
Copiah County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors , Copiah County, Mississippi Democratic Party Executive Committee , Copiah County, Mississippi Republican Party Executive Committee and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wells v. Thurmond et al
as 3:2010cv00495
Plaintiff:
Dormetrice Wells
Defendant:
Brian Thurmond and City of Crystal Springs, MS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Koch Foods of Mississippi, LLC
as 3:2010cv00047
Plaintiff:
Antoino M. Adams, All Plaintiffs, James C. Anderson and others
Defendant:
Koch Foods of Mississippi, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Thurmond v. Wal Mart Stores
as 3:2009cv00202
Plaintiff:
Deanndera Thurmond
Defendant:
Wal Mart Stores and Wal Mart Stores
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Germany v. Mississippi State Board of Dental Examiners et al
as 3:2008cv00470
Plaintiff:
Jonathan D. Germany and Jonathan D. Germany
Defendant:
Mississippi State Board of Dental Examiners, John Walter Starr, Jr., James A. Bounds and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc., et al
as 3:2007cv00087
Plaintiff:
Lillie Williams, Lillie Williams, Thurmond Gamble and others
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc., Tyson Foods, Inc., Tyson Foods, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
