Cases 1 - 10 of 23
SHANK et al v. PARRISH
as 2:2023cv02769
Plaintiff:
KEITH SHANK and RAYMOND TILLERY
Defendant:
MARK PARRISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
LIN v. TILLERY et al
as 2:2021cv00409
Plaintiff:
ZHEN LIN
Defendant:
SPENCER TILLERY, JR., UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER-PA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
TILLERY v. EASON et al
as 2:2020cv02675
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, KENNETH EASON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
MAJOR GEORGE TILLERY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TILLERY v. DR. RONALD PHILLIPS et al
as 2:2019cv05064
Plaintiff:
RASHEEM TILLERY
Defendant:
DR. RONALD PHILLIPS, DAVID BYRNES, MARIEL TRIMBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEY INGREDIENT CATERING LLC et al v. WORLD CUP PACKAGING et al
as 5:2019cv01178
Defendant:
BOB SEAY, WORLD CUP PACKAGING, DAVID TILLERY and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW PIVNICK and KEY INGREDIENT CATERING LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tillery v. Noel et al
as 3:2018cv00783
Plaintiff:
Major Tillery
Defendant:
Paul Noel and Pandya Haresh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
TILLERY v. THE WEDGE MEDICAL CENTER, INC.
as 2:2016cv05113
Plaintiff:
LOVOIL TILLERY
Defendant:
THE WEDGE MEDICAL CENTER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Tillery v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2016cv00235
Plaintiff:
Major George Tillery
Defendant:
John Wetzel, John Kerestes, Brenda Tritt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TILLERY V. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2015cv04799
Petitioner:
JOSEPH TILLERY
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE (PBPP), JOHN KERESTES, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
