Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Timms v. Aspinwall et al
as 2:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Timms
Defendant:
Frank Aspinwall, Stephen Tillman and The State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timms v. Aspinwall et al
as 4:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Timms
Defendant:
Frank Aspinwall, Stephen Tillman and The State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timms v. Ascension St. Vincent's Coastal Cardiology
as 2:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Dale Timms
Defendant:
Ascension St. Vincent's Coastal Cardiology formerly doing business as Coastal Cardiology P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Sadowski v. Vision General Contractors of GA, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sadowski
Defendant:
Vision General Contractors of GA, LLC and Robert D. Timm
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Timms v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.
as 2:2019cv00169
Plaintiff:
Victoria Timms
Defendant:
Publix Super Markets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Timms v. Deal et al
as 6:2019cv00055
Defendant:
C/O Hutchison, C/O Jhoson, Sgt. Prejett and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Timms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timms v. Ricardo et al
as 1:2017cv00031
Plaintiff:
Kelly Jo Timms
Defendant:
Gustavo Ricardo , JP Trans Inc and National Indemnity Company of the South
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TIMMS v. DAVISON et al
as 5:2016cv00526
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TIMMS
Defendant:
ANDRE DAVISON, WENDELL ANDERSON, TIMOTHY CRAWLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poole v. Lowery et al
as 1:2016cv02206
Plaintiff:
Theresa C. Poole
Defendant:
Terry Lowery , Western Flyer Express, LLC , R. W. Timms Leasing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TIMMS v. DAVISON et al
as 5:2015cv00305
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TIMMS
Defendant:
ANDRE DAVISON and WENDELL ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
