Cases 21 - 30 of 299
YOUNG v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv00715
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, MICHAEL HOROWITZ, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy Young v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 22-5052
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Justice and others
YOUNG v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, MICHAEL HOROWITZ, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy Young v. Department of Justice
as 22-10052
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Respondent / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
YOUNG v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2021cv03393
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. United States Dept of Justice
as 1:2021cv01985
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
United States Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Doyle Young v. United States Department of Justice
as 2:2021cv05841
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 1:2021cv01755
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Department of Justice
as 1:2021cv01711
Respondent:
Department of Justice
Petitioner:
Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Young v. USA et al
as 1:2021cv01517
Defendant:
Dept of Justice, US Attorney General and USA
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
