Cases 21 - 30 of 188
Minor v. Turner et al
as 3:2022cv00221
Plaintiff:
Cedric Minor
Defendant:
Marshall Turner, Timothy Morris and Lee Simon
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilburn v. Cain et al
as 4:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Reggie Wilburn
Defendant:
Burl Cain, Donald Faucett, Timothy J. Donovan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mansour Mohammad v. Jacqueline Lashbrook, et al
as 22-1520
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANSOUR MOHAMMAD
Defendant / Appellee:
JACQUELINE LASHBROOK, Warden, TIMOTHY MORRIS, REGGIE EPPLIN, Correctional Officer and others
Hamp, Jr. v. Cain et al
as 3:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Brymon Hamp, Jr.
Defendant:
Nathan Burl Cain, Timothy Morris, Dr. James Glisson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gayles v. Cain et al
as 4:2022cv00034
Plaintiff:
Charles Gayles
Defendant:
Nathan Burl Cain, Jeworski Mallett, Timothy Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Rinaldo Eugene Norris
Defendant:
Jessie Williams, Bobby Tyler, Kimberly Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McCullum v. Turner et al
as 3:2022cv00107
Plaintiff:
John Paul McCullum
Defendant:
Marshal Turner, Timothy Morris, Lee Simon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mack v. Sturdivant et al
as 4:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
James Lee Mack
Defendant:
Marylen Sturdivant, Timothy Morris, Lee Simon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McGilBerry v. Morris et al
as 4:2021cv00168
Plaintiff:
Phillip Charles McGilBerry
Defendant:
Timothy Morris, Johnnie Denmark and Earnest Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Allred v. Morris
as 4:2021cv00148
Petitioner:
Bobby Allred
Respondent:
Timothy Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
