Cases 1 - 10 of 10
(PC) Lucero v. Richards
as 2:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Timothy Paul Lucero
Defendant:
Ramisha Slocum Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Lucero v. The People of the State of California
as 2:2024cv00268
Petitioner:
Timothy Paul Lucero
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Lucero v. The People of the State of California
as 2:2024cv00267
Petitioner:
Timothy Paul Lucero
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Lucero v. The People
as 2:2023cv02852
Petitioner:
Timothy Paul Lucero
Respondent:
The People
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Lucero v. State of California
as 2:2023cv02844
Plaintiff:
Timothy Paul Lucero
Defendant:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stribling v. Delaney et al
as 2:2017cv02664
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lamont Stribling
Defendant:
Carolyn K. Delaney and Timothy Paul Lindeu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucero v. Warden and Associate Wardens of California Mens Colony East Facility
as 2:2016cv00142
Plaintiff:
Timothy Paul Lucero
Defendant:
Warden and Associate Wardens of California Mens Colony East Facility
Lucero v. Warden and Associate Wardens of California Mens Colony (East Facility)
as 3:2015cv05995
Plaintiff:
Timothy Paul Lucero
Defendant:
Warden and Associate Wardens of California Mens Colony (East Facility)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Layton v. Knipp
as 2:2013cv01618
Plaintiff:
Timothy Paul Layton
Defendant:
William B. Knipp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riches v. Rudolph et al
as 2:2007cv02182
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Eric Robert Rudolph, James Charles Kopp, Dennis John Malvasi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
