Cases filed in Ohio
Cases 1 - 10 of 350
Oldham v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02148
Plaintiff: Tina Oldham
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00792
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bess v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01829
Plaintiff: Tina Bess
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McVeigh v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01678
Plaintiff: Tina L McVeigh
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moran v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01243
Plaintiff: Tina Moran
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Morin v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00850
Plaintiff: Tina Morin
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wooden v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff: Tina M Wooden
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04226
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Schafer v. Kohl's Department Store
as 5:2023cv02245
Plaintiff: Tina Schafer
Defendant: Kohl's Department Store
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Robinson v. County of Mahoning et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv02251
Plaintiff: Monty Robinson
Defendant: County of Mahoning, D. Ditzler, C. Righettetti-Rimedio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?