Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Boyce v. Spruce Power Holding Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv08591
Plaintiff:
Toby Boyce
Defendant:
Jonathan J. Ledecky, Brian Piern, Thomas J. Hynes III and others
Nominal Defendant:
Spruce Power Holding Corporation
Gilliam v. Greenberg Traurig, LLP et al
as 7:2023cv06144
Plaintiff:
James W. Gilliam, LLB
Defendant:
Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick, Esq. and Toby S. Soli, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jiang v. Avaya Holdings Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv01258
Plaintiff:
Oliver Jiang
Defendant:
Avaya Holdings Corp., James M. Chirico, Jr. and Kieran J. McGrath
Petitioner:
Tareq Salah, Samba Yarlagadda, Paul Sweatt and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Todd Sievers
Carlisle v. Shift Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09732
Plaintiff:
Samuel Carlisle
Defendant:
Shift Technologies, Inc., George Arison, Toby Russell and others
Nunez v. Bentivegna et al
as 1:2022cv05673
Plaintiff:
Toby Nunez
Defendant:
Dr. Robert Bentivegna, Kyoung S. Kim, Mary Ashong and others
Interested Party:
NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE-GENERIC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobs v. BioSpecifics Technologies Corp. et al
as 1:2020cv09718
Defendant:
Paul Gitman, Paul Wegman, BioSpecifics Technologies Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jacobs
Antetokounmpo v. Hurst
as 1:2020cv07018
Plaintiff:
Giannis Antetokounmpo
Defendant:
Toby Hurst
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv04622
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv00827
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv10416
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
