Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Parshall v. LifeLock Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv04434
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Defendant:
LifeLock Incorporated, Roy A Guthrie, Hilary A Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Gassel v. Davis et al
as 2:2015cv02173
Plaintiff:
Larisa Gassel
Defendant:
Todd Davis, Chris Power, Gary S Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Avila v. LifeLock Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv01398
Defendant:
LifeLock Incorporated , Todd Davis and Chris Power
Plaintiff:
Miguel Avila
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Scesny v. LifeLock Incorporated et al
as 2:2014cv00479
Plaintiff:
Joseph F Scesny
Defendant:
LifeLock Incorporated , Todd Davis and Chris Power
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Bien v. LifeLock Incorporated et al
as 2:2014cv00416
Plaintiff:
Dawn E Bien
Defendant:
LifeLock Incorporated , Todd Davis and Chris Power
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Richardson v. Lifelock Incorporated, et al
as 2:2013cv00731
Plaintiff:
Denise Richardson
Defendant:
LifeLock Incorporated and Todd Davis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Federal Trade Commission v. LifeLock, Inc., et al
as 2:2010cv00530
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
LifeLock, Inc. , Richard Todd Davis and Robert J Maynard, Jr
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053
Ly v. Lifelock, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv02030
Plaintiff:
Tommy Ly, Tommy Ly and Tommy Ly
Defendant:
LifeLock, Inc. and Richard Todd Davis
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Falke et al v. Lifelock, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv02027
Plaintiff:
Gerald Falke, Gerald Falke, Gerald Falke and others
Defendant:
LifeLock, Inc., LifeLock, Inc., LifeLock, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Robert Dillon v. Lifelock, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv02024
Plaintiff:
Robert Dillon, Robert Dillon, Robert Dillon and others
Defendant:
LifeLock, Inc., LifeLock, Inc., Richard Todd Davis and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
