Cases 31 - 40 of 56
Lankford v. Thomas
as 1:2012cv00362
Plaintiff:
Kirk Lankford
Defendant:
Todd Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Medeiros et al v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2012cv00340
Plaintiff:
Beverly Lokelani Medeiros , Molliann Waltjen , Kawahinekuuipolani Cliffann Medeiros and others
Defendant:
State of Hawaii , Hawaii Department of Public Safety , Jodie F. Maesaka-Hirata and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Matsuda v. Griego et al
as 1:2012cv00326
Plaintiff:
Alison Noboru Matsuda
Defendant:
B. Griego, Todd Thomas and State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bronson Nunuha, Estate of et al v. Hawaii, State of et al
as 1:2012cv00147
Plaintiff:
Brandy Nunuha-Tachera , Davina Waialae and Z. L. S.
Defendant:
Hawaii, State of , Public Safety, Hawaii Department of , Jodie F. Maesaka-Hirata and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Penaflor v. Thomas
as 1:2012cv00050
Petitioner:
Crandall Penaflor
Respondent:
Todd Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Maluia v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2011cv00735
Plaintiff:
Sapatumoe'ese Maluia
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America , Daren Swenson , Todd Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Loher v. Thomas
as 1:2011cv00731
Petitioner:
Frank O. Loher
Respondent:
Todd Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beach v. Thomas et al
as 1:2011cv00572
Petitioner:
Charles Rivera Beach
Respondent:
Todd Thomas and Nolan Espinda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nakamasu v. Thomas
as 1:2011cv00543
Petitioner:
Lyle F. Nakamasu
Respondent:
Todd Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abordo v. Corrections Corporation of America Inc et al
as 1:2011cv00327
Plaintiff:
Edmund M. Abordo
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Inc. and Todd Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
