Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Thompson v. Corrections Corp. of America et al
as 5:2010cv00069
Plaintiff:
Jamel Deangelo Thompson
Defendant:
Corrections Corp. of America, Todd Thomas, Peggie Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Corrections Corp. of America et al
as 6:2010cv00049
Plaintiff:
Jamel Thompson
Defendant:
Corrections Corp. of America, Todd Thomas, Peggie Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mikell v. Thomas
as 4:2009cv00171
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Mikell, Sr.
Defendant:
Todd Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Thomas
as 5:2008cv00414
Petitioner:
Larry Thomas, Sr.
Respondent:
Todd Thomas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thoams v. Thomas et al
as 5:2007cv00077
Plaintiff:
Eugene Thomas
Defendant:
Todd Thomas, Peggy Ann Cooper, Acie Lott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. Donald et al
as 1:2007cv02306
Petitioner:
David Earl Frazier
Respondent:
James E. Donald and Todd Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gates v. Thomas et al
as 5:2007cv00064
Plaintiff:
Roy Gates
Defendant:
Todd Thomas, A. Boatright, Peggy Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Thomas
as 1:2007cv01561
Petitioner:
Brandon Jackson
Respondent:
Todd Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Thomas
as 5:2007cv00195
Petitioner:
Brandon Jackson
Respondent:
Todd Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nesmith v. Corrections Corporations of America et al
as 5:2007cv00043
Plaintiff:
William Ira Nesmith
Defendant:
Corrections Corporations of America, Coffee Correctional Facility, J. A. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
