Cases 31 - 40 of 158
Jones v. Frantz et al
as 1:2013cv00370
Plaintiff:
Alexisius Jones
Defendant:
Paula Frantz, Tom Clements, Janice Eads and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hebert v. Clements et al
as 1:2013cv00259
Plaintiff:
Hal Lewis Hebert
Defendant:
Tom Clements, James Falk, Michelle Nycz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisher v. Clements et al
as 1:2013cv00146
Petitioner:
Michael J. Fisher
Respondent:
Tom Clements , John Davis and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simmons v. Clements et al
as 1:2012cv03366
Plaintiff:
Leo Simmons
Defendant:
Tom Clements, James Falk and Andrea Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calderon v. Allen et al
as 1:2012cv03344
Plaintiff:
Raul Permuy Calderon
Defendant:
Debra Allen, Tom Walters, Rebecca Oakes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gandy v. Clements et al
as 1:2012cv03331
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Gandy
Defendant:
Tom Clements, Steve Smith, Jerry Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Obama, et al
as 1:2012cv03265
Plaintiff:
Larry Gordon
Defendant:
Tom Clements, Vance Everett, Colleen Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bachofer v. Creany et al
as 1:2012cv03254
Plaintiff:
Baruch Bachofer
Defendant:
Timothy Creany Jr. , Paula Frantz, Klenke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dmytryszyn v. Clements et al
as 1:2012cv03241
Plaintiff:
Adam Dmytryszyn
Defendant:
Tom Clements, Bernadette Scott, T. Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynch v. Clement et al
as 1:2012cv03162
Plaintiff:
Javay Lynch
Defendant:
Tom Clement, Ken Topless, Linda Worthen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
