Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Scott v. Commonwealth of Pennyslvania
as 1:2023cv10902
Petitioner:
Tonia Scott
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennyslvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Lowe et al
as 1:2022cv07697
Petitioner:
Tonia Scott
Respondent:
Craig Lowe and Raymond Tonkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Scott v. Tonkin et al
as 1:2021cv01306
Defendant:
and Et Al, Craig Lowe and Raymond Tonkin
Plaintiff:
Tonia' Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Pike County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2020cv03645
Respondent:
President Gregory H. Chelak, Pike County Correctional Facility and Joshua Shapiro
Petitioner:
Tonia Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05905
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Moyer et al
as 1:2018cv05906
Plaintiff:
Tonia Scott
Defendant:
John Moyer, Marc Grammes, Matthew M. Osterberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. New York State Dept. of Motor Vehicles et al.
as 1:2017cv03517
Plaintiff:
Tonia Scott
Defendant:
New York State Dept. of Motor Vehicles, Metropolitan Transportation Authority Bridges & Tunnels, Terry Margaret and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Saw Creek Estate Community Association, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01685
Plaintiff:
Tonia Scott
Defendant:
Saw Creek Estate Community Association, Inc., Peter Derrenbacher, Eugene Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Pine Ridge Community Association et al.
as 1:2017cv01682
Plaintiff:
Tonia Scott
Defendant:
Pine Ridge Community Association, Joseph Peritore, Theresa Elliott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Kaskel
as 1:2017cv01683
Plaintiff:
Tonia Scott
Defendant:
Susan Kaskel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
