Cases 21 - 30 of 208
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00119
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WANG et al v. NEW MIGHTY U.S. TRUST et al
as 1:2021cv03111
Plaintiff:
VEN-JIAO (TONY) WANG, YU-MEI CHOU, HSIUE-HUEI (TAMMY) WANG and others
Defendant:
NEW MIGHTY U.S. TRUST, NEW MIGHT FOUNDATION, CLEARBRIDGE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ODOM v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2021cv03074
Plaintiff:
Tony Odom
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
IRONS v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv02451
Plaintiff:
TONI IRONS
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN and KAMALA HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IRONS v. KEMP
as 1:2021cv02452
Plaintiff:
TONI IRONS
Defendant:
BRIAN P. KEMP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tony Weems v. Patricia Cushwa, et al
as 21-5189
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tony Weems
Defendant / Appellee:
Patricia Cushwa, Commissioner of the United States Parole Commission, Patricia Wilson-Smoot, Commissioner of the United Parole Commission, Charles Massarone, Commissioner of the United Parole Commission and others
John Ray v. CLH New York Ave, LLC, et al
as 21-7092
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John L. Ray
Defendant / Appellee:
CLH New York Ave, LLC, Richard Cohen, Donnie Hinton and others
RODRIGUEZ GUEVARA v. KAJ CORPORATION et al
as 1:2021cv02103
Defendant:
BEOM SEOG CHOE, KAJ CORPORATION doing business as TONY'S BREAKFAST, KWI HWA CHOE and others
Plaintiff:
SANDRA RODRIGUEZ GUEVARA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
INDIGENOUS PEOPLE OF BIAFRA v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2021cv02068
Plaintiff:
INDIGENOUS PEOPLE OF BIAFRA
Defendant:
TONY BLINKEN and LLOYD AUSTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
