Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Laird v. Smith et al
as 1:2011cv00541
Plaintiff:
Anthony Laird
Defendant:
Johanna Smith, Brent Reinke, Lawrence Wasden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2010cv00373
Plaintiff:
Tony R Stokes
Defendant:
State of Idaho, IDOC, Johanna Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes v. Smith et al
as 1:2010cv00246
Petitioner:
Tony R Stokes
Respondent:
Johanna Smith, Keith Yordy, Brent Reinke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Searcy v. Idaho State Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv00166
Plaintiff:
Barry Searcy
Defendant:
Idaho State Board of Corrections, IDOC, Carolyn Meline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stokes et al v. Garner et al
as 1:2009cv00656
Plaintiff:
Tony R Stokes, Richard A Carlin, Jeffery T Garner and others
Defendant:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolf et al v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2009cv00632
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf, Jimmy T. Glass, Patrick K. Knight and others
Defendant:
State of Idaho, State Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gold v. Parker Toyota, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00618
Plaintiff:
Laurie Ann Gold
Defendant:
Parker Toyota, Inc., Tony Cruickshank, Mike White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Siegel v. Edmark Auto, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00443
Plaintiff:
Toni Siegel
Defendant:
Edmark Auto, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
John et al v. Bingham County Idaho et al
as 4:2009cv00146
Plaintiff:
Kirk M John, Tina John, KJ and others
Defendant:
Bingham County Idaho, Tony Christensen, Benjamin Kidd and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
