Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
John Canning v. Trevonza Bobbitt, et al
as 23-13992
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN CANNING
Defendant / Appellee:
TREVONZA BOBBITT, JOSH WICKER, DEIDRA EDWARDS and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Nathan Crisp v. The State of Georgia, et al
as 23-10625
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHAN D. CRISP
Defendant / Appellee:
THE STATE OF GEORGIA, SCOT W. SCHUNK, TOOLE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv80262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Fort Lauderdale Food Not Bombs, et al v. City of Fort Lauderdale
as 23-10173
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FORT LAUDERDALE FOOD NOT BOMBS, NATHAN PIM, JILLIAN PIM and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE
WRIGHT v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00324
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wright
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, JOHN DOE, WARDEN BENJAMIN FORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv22350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Canning v. Jackson et al
as 6:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
John Canning
Defendant:
Shirley Jackson, Fnu Olowsky, Trevonza Bobbitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crisp v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2022cv02057
Plaintiff:
Sergeant Nathan D. Crisp
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, State Employee Scot W. Schunk, State Employee ADA Toole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv21492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
