Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Whitcomb v. Affirm Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv02099
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitcomb
Defendant:
Affirm Holdings, Inc., Max Levchin and Michael Linford
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Toole
Toole v. Affirm Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01243
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Toole
Defendant:
Affirm Holdings, Inc., Max Levchin and Michael Linford
Petitioner:
Birgul Arslan, Michael Bergenholtz, Daryn Bourbin and others
Stein v. Extended Stay America, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03272
Defendant:
Ellen Keszler, Kapila K. Anand, Thomas F. O' Toole and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
William Guy v. Pedro J. Pizarro et al
as 2:2019cv00693
Defendant:
Southern California Edison Company, James T. Morris, Richard T. Schlosberg III and others
Plaintiff:
William Guy
Wefer v. LSC Communications, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00007
Defendant:
LSC Communications, Inc., Shivan S. Subramaniam, Thomas F. O' Toole and others
Plaintiff:
David Wefer
MCCULLOUGH v. DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv01563
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MCCULLOUGH
Defendant:
DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC. , LAMMOT J. DUPONT , MICHAEL A. COKE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
LAWRENCE v. DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv01465
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LAWRENCE
Defendant:
DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC., LAMMOT J. DUPONT, MICHAEL A. COKE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
CANCHOLA v. DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv01481
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CANCHOLA
Defendant:
DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC., LAMMOT J. DUPONT, MICHAEL A. COKE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Lawrence v. Dupont Fabros Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02042
Plaintiff:
William Lawrence
Defendant:
Dupont Fabros Technology, Inc., Lammott J Dupont, Michael A. Coke and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
SCARANTINO v. DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv01428
Plaintiff:
LOUIS SCARANTINO
Defendant:
DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, INC., DUPONT FABROS TECHNOLOGY, L.P., LAMMOT J. DUPONT and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
