Cases 1 - 10 of 163
Brentrez McPherson v. Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10687
Plaintiff:
BRENTREZ MCPHERSON
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TYRONE OLIVER, JACOB BEASLEY and others
McPherson v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Brentrez McPherson and Royal High Chief Priest BaBA
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Tyrone Oliver, Jacob Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quarterman v. Danforth et al
as 5:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
Willie Quarterman
Defendant:
Robert Danforth, Robert Tool and Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler et al v. Oliver et al
as 4:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Darryl Pernell Butler
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Timothy Ward, Ahmed Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-11445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Martin v. Adams et al
as 6:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Nolan Craig Martin
Defendant:
Warden Adams, Warden Chambers and Mr. Tool
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-10798
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOON, STEVE UPON and others
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-10630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Waseem Daker v. Brian Owens, et al
as 23-10146
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN OWENS, RICK JACOBS, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Waseem Daker v. Brian Owens, et al
as 22-14263
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN OWENS, RICK JACOBS, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
