Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Knights Templar Commandery et al
as 5:2024cv00033
Defendant:
Fredro Starr, Knights Tempar Commandery Zone 12, Southgate, CA and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Noco Company v. Shanghai Greatway Welding Equipment Co., Ltd.
as 1:2021cv01473
Plaintiff:
Noco Company
Defendant:
Shanghai Greatway Welding Equipment Co., Ltd. doing business as Topac
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Nike, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2020cv04803
Plaintiff:
Nike, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", ClearanceSale Store, JKCK Official Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Nike, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2020cv02626
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Better Me Store, BJCJWF0526 Store and others
Plaintiff:
ABC Corporation and Nike, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
ABC Corporation v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2020cv02615
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Zhoumanlingds, brilliantcy and others
Plaintiff:
ABC Corporation and Nike, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Purdy v. Topac Express, a corporation et al
as 4:2016cv10740
Plaintiff:
Shelly Elizabeth Purdy
Defendant:
Topac Express, a corporation and Gurwinder Bains Bains, an individual
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TOPAC Business Solutions Tecnologia Do Brasil, Ltda., v. Pinacle Trading Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv20476
Plaintiff:
TOPAC Business Solutions Tecnologia Do Brasil, LTDA.
Defendant:
Pinacle Trading Corp., Marco Ramirez, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
