Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Tormu Prall v. Attorney General New Jersey, et al
as 21-1526
Plaintiff / Appellant: TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant / Appellee: ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Tormu Prall v. Supreme Court, et al
as 19-3183
Defendant / Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL, GOVERNOR, GARY M. LANIGAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: TORMU E. PRALL
Not Yet Classified: STANLEY JUDSON
In re: Tormu Prall
as 17-2711
Petitioner: In re: TORMU E. PRALL
Respondent: PROSECUTOR MERCER COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
In re: Tormu Prall We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-3442
Plaintiff - Petitioner: In re: TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Respondent: MICHELE R. RICCI, WILLIAM MOLEINS, CHRIS HOLMES and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent: JEROME B. SIMANDLE
In re: Tormu E. Prall, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-2870
Petitioner: In re: TORMU E. PRALL
Respondent: GARY M. LANIGAN and NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Nominal Respondent: ANNE E. THOMPSON
In Re: Tormu Prall We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-2074
Petitioner: TORMU E. PRALL
Respondent: JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
Nominal Respondent: JEROME B. SIMANDLE
In Re: Tormu Prall, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-2459
Petitioner: TORMU E. PRALL
Respondent: NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and GARY M. LANIGAN
In Re: Tormu E. Prall, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-3947
Petitioner: TORMU E. PRALL
Respondent: SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION NEW JERSEY, SUPERIOR COURT and others
Prall v. Cambridge District Court
as 12-2238
Petitioner: TORMU E. PRALL
Respondent: MARTHA COAKLEY, Attorney General
In Re: Prall
as 12-1959
Petitioner: TORMU E. PRALL
Respondent: MA SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT, OFFICE OF THE BAR COUNSEL, CITY OF BOSTON, Law Department and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?