Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00563
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Rubio et al v. The Toro Company et al
as 3:2021cv00304
Defendant:
Toyota Industries Corporation doing business as The Raymond Corporation also known as The Raymond Corporation, The Toro Company doing business as Toro Manufacturing Corporation, OLP Haskins El Paso TX, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Guillermina Rubio, Lorenzo Rubio, Jr, Lilliana Rubio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bargellini et al v. The Toro Company
as 3:2017cv01480
Plaintiff:
Eugene Bargellini and Maria Bargellini
Defendant:
The Toro Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Landmark Technology, LLC v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 6:2012cv00590
Plaintiff:
Landmark Technology, LLC
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Landmark Technology, LLC
Consol_defendant:
The Toro Company , Wolverine World Wide, Inc. , Cintas Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Landmark Technology, LLC v. The Toro Company
as 6:2012cv00592
Plaintiff:
Landmark Technology, LLC
Defendant:
The Toro Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hoeker v. Sears, Roebuck & Company et al
as 2:2008cv00350
Plaintiff:
Phillip A. Hoeker
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck & Company, Deere & Company, Tecumseh Products Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Bennett et al v. Sears,Roebuck and Company et al
as 2:2008cv00344
Plaintiff:
Gene Bennett, Clarence Laird and Laci Canion
Defendant:
Sears,Roebuck and Company, Platinum Equity, LLC, Briggs & Stratton Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
