Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 188
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
Tech Data Corporation et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2011cv02454
Plaintiff: Tech Data Corporation and Tech Data Product Management, Inc.
Defendant: AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv04119
Plaintiff: ABC Appliance, Inc., P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation and Marta Cooperative of America, Inc.
Special Master: Martin Quinn
Defendant: NEC Corporation of America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, CMO Japan CO., LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Schultze Agency Services, LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv03856
Special Master: Martin Quinn
Defendant: NEC Corporation of America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, CMO Japan CO., LTD and others
Plaintiff: Schultze Agency Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Washington State, et al v. Chimei Innolux Corp., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-16862
Plaintiff - Appellee: WASHINGTON STATE, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General of the State of California, as parens patriae on behalf of natural persons residing in the state, THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant - Appellant: CHIMEI INNOLUX CORP., CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC., CMO JAPAN CO., LTD. and others
Interbond Corporation of America v. AU Optronics Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv03763
Special Master: Martin Quinn
Defendant: CMO Japan Co., Ltd., NEC Corporation of America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Interbond Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Schultze Agency Services, LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv03168
Defendant: AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, CMO Japan CO., LTD and others
Plaintiff: Schultze Agency Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv02903
Plaintiff: ABC Appliance, Inc., Marta Cooperative of America, Inc. and P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation
Defendant: AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, CMO Japan CO., LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Interbond Corporation of America v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 0:2011cv61264
Defendant: AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Interbond Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Office Depot, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv02225
Special Master: Martin Quinn
Plaintiff: Office Depot, Inc.
Defendant: CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Mitsui & Co. (Usa) Inc., and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Office Depot, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 9:2011cv80349
Defendant: AU Optronics Corporation, Au Optronics Corporation America, Inc., Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Office Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0015

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?