Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv01645
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
ILCSC, et al v. Richard Figueroa, Jr.
as 20-55193
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARK BECKWITH, SHARON STEEN, DBA Central Pharmacy, TRAN PHARMACY, INC. and others
Respondent / Appellee:
RICHARD FIGUEROA, Jr., Acting Director of Department of Health Care Services of the State of California
Managed Pharmacy Care, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 12-55623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MANAGED PHARMACY CARE, a California corporation, INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC., a California corporation, CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION FOR INDENPENDENT LIVING CENTERS, a California corporation and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Defendant - Appellee:
TOBY DOUGLAS, Director of the Department of Health Care Services of the State of California
Managed Pharmacy Care, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 12-55605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MANAGED PHARMACY CARE, a California corporation, INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC., a California corporation, CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION FOR INDENPENDENT LIVING CENTERS, a California corporation and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Defendant - Appellee:
TOBY DOUGLAS, Director of the Department of Health Care Services of the State of California
Managed Pharmacy Care, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 12-55332
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MANAGED PHARMACY CARE, a California corporation, INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC., a California corporation, CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION FOR INDENPENDENT LIVING CENTERS, a California corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the U S Department of Health and Human Services
Defendant:
TOBY DOUGLAS, Director of Department of Health Care Services of State of California
Managed Pharmacy Care, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 12-55067
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MANAGED PHARMACY CARE, a California corporation, INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC., a California corporation, CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION FOR INDENPENDENT LIVING CENTERS, a California corporation and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the U S Department of Health and Human Services
Defendant - Appellant:
TOBY DOUGLAS, Director of Department of Health Care Services of State of California
Managed Pharmacy Care et al v. Kathleen Sebelius et al
as 2:2011cv09211
Plaintiff:
Mark Beckwith, California Foundation for Indenpendent Living Centers, Independent Living Center of Southern California Inc and others
Defendant:
Does, Toby Douglas and Kathleen Sebelius
California Pharmacists Assoc., et al v. David Maxwell-Jolly
as 10-55893
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALIFORNIA PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION, GERALD SHAPIRO, PHARM.D., DBA Uptown Pharmacy & Gift Shoppe, SHARON STEEN, DBA Central Pharmacy and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID MAXWELL-JOLLY, Director of Department of Health Care Services of the State of California
California Pharmacists Assoc., et al v. David Maxwell-Jolly
as 10-55883
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION, GERALD SHAPIRO, PHARM.D., DBA Uptown Pharmacy & Gift Shoppe, SHARON STEEN, DBA Central Pharmacy and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID MAXWELL-JOLLY, Director of Department of Health Care Services of the State of California
California Pharmacists Associa, et al v. David Maxwell-Jolly
as 09-57065
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALIFORNIA PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION, GERALD SHAPIRO, PHARM.D., doing business as Uptown Pharmacy & Gift Shoppe, SHARON STEEN, doing business as Central Pharmacy and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID MAXWELL-JOLLY, Director of Department of Health Care Services of the State of California
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
