Cases 31 - 40 of 188
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Aqua Plumbing & Heating Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv10303
Plaintiff:
Travelers Property Casualty Company a/s/o Commerce-Halsey and Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Defendant:
Aqua Plumbing & Heating Corp., Automated Design Consultants and Automated Design Engineering PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lp Diversity-Property Damage/Product Liability
PAR Technology Corporation et al v. The Travelers Companies, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv01121
Plaintiff:
PAR Technology Corporation and ParTech, Inc.
Defendant:
The Travelers Companies, Inc., Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Camali TV, Inc. v. Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
as 1:2022cv06278
Plaintiff:
Camali TV, Inc.
Defendant:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
MSP Recovery Claims Series 44, LLC v. Travelers Idemnity Company et al
as 3:2022cv01290
Plaintiff:
MSP Recovery Claims Series 44, LLC
Defendant:
The Travelers Idemnity Company, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, The Travelers Casualty Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Expeditors International of Washington Inc
as 1:2022cv08572
Plaintiff:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Defendant:
Expeditors International of Washington Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1300 F.E.L.A. (DISCONTINUED AFTER 1/27/2014)
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07943
Plaintiff:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Defendant:
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc., AIT Worldwide Logistics, Inc. and C.H. Robinson International, Inc.
4Th Party Defendant:
M/V One Apus, in rem, CHIDORI SHIP HOLDING LLC, JESSICA SHIP HOLDING S.A. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd. and Hapag Lloyd Aktiengesellchaft, Hamburg
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Yang Ming Marine Transport Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC v. Travelers Indemnity Company et al
as 3:2022cv01012
Plaintiff:
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC
Defendant:
Travelers Indemnity Company, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, Travelers Casualty Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC v. Travelers Indemnity Company et al
as 3:2022cv00964
Plaintiff:
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC
Defendant:
The Travelers Indemnity Company, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, The Travelers Casualty Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
MSP Recovery Claims Series 44, LLC v. Travelers Indemnity Company et al
as 3:2022cv00963
Plaintiff:
MSP Recovery Claims Series 44, LLC
Defendant:
The Travelers Indemnity Company, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, The Travelers Casualty Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. American Commercial Transport, Inc et al
as 1:2022cv06386
Plaintiff:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
American Commercial Transport, Inc., UPS Asia Group Pte Ltd. and Pronto Great China Corp
Defendant:
Rohlig USA LLC, Topocean Consolidation Service (Los Angeles) Inc., Translink Shipping Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Hyundai Merchant Marine CO Ltd
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd., Shine Shipping Ltd, Shine International Transportation (Hong Kong) Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported (DISCONTINUED AFTER 1/27/2014)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
