Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Travis Phillips v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 19-50797
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAVIS R. PHILLIPS
Defendant / Appellee:
GROVER J. GEISELMAN, III, JOHN G. HOFFMAN, H. DALTON WALLACE and others
Phillips v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2018cv00501
Defendant:
First National Bank, Grover J. Geiselman, III, John G. Hoffman and others
Plaintiff:
Travis R. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Negotiable Instrumen
Phillips v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2017cv01074
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Travis R. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Foreclosure
Travis Phillips v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 16-50692
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVIS R. PHILLIPS
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Phillips v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2016cv00287
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Travis R. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Phillips v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2015cv00790
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Travis R. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Phillips v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2014cv00544
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Travis R. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Phillips v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2014cv00054
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Travis R. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Phillips v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2012cv00905
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Travis R. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Phillips v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 5:2012cv00894
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Travis R. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
