Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Du Ma's v. Tri Met
as 3:2021cv00593
Plaintiff:
Randall Du Ma's
Defendant:
Tri Met
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02067
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01882
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12201 Americans With Disabilities Act-Injured Worker Discrimination
Stull v. Maurry et al
as 3:2013cv02211
Defendant:
Brad Avakian, City of Portland, Jason Maurry and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Joe Stull
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bricker v. Tri-Met
as 3:2012cv01868
Plaintiff:
Jennie L. Bricker
Defendant:
Tri-Met
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gittings v. Tri-Met et al
as 3:2012cv00709
Defendant:
Sandi L. Day and Tri-Met
Plaintiff:
Robert Erik Gittings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sale et al v. Tri-Met et al
as 3:2012cv00708
Defendant:
Sandi L. Day and Tri-Met
Plaintiff:
Estate of Danielle Nicole Sale, David B. Sale and Jeanette L. Sale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelly v. USBANCORP-USBANK-GMAC-MERS et al
as 3:2012cv00199
Defendant:
John V. Acosta, Sam Adams, Ann L. Aiken and others
503) 296-5762 (fax:
Roberta Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Bell v. Pension Plan for Bargaining Unit Employees of Tri-Met et al
as 3:2011cv00935
Plaintiff:
Richard Bell
Defendant:
Beth DeHamel, Yvette Farra, Jon Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Kelly v. Schnitzer et al
as 3:2011cv00211
Defendant:
Sam Adams, Bishop-White & Marshall, P.S., Lloyd C. Blankfein and others
Ee IRS) Internal Revenue Service:
Goldman Sachs & Company
503) 296-5762 (fax:
Roberta Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
