Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Dunn v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
John O. Dunn, II
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Joseph Burnette, Mr. Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Trinity Food Service
as 2:2017cv00239
Plaintiff:
Ben Smith
Defendant:
Trinity Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Core Civic's Policy et al
as 6:2017cv00027
Plaintiff:
Willie Frank Wright, Jr.
Defendant:
Core Civic's Policy, Trinity Food Service, Robert Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. DeKalb County Jail et al
as 1:2015cv03909
Plaintiff:
Bryan G. Parker
Defendant:
DeKalb County Jail, Dekalb County Jail Medical, Dekalb County Jail Food Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wimberly v. Sproul et al
as 1:2013cv00073
Plaintiff:
Henry James Wimberly, Jr.
Defendant:
Kevin Sproul, Major Haggerty, RICK HANES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wimberly v. Sproul et al
as 1:2013cv00066
Plaintiff:
Henry James Wimberly, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Sproul, Major Haggerty, Trinity Food Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nasa v. Aramark Food Services
as 1:2011cv02746
Plaintiff:
Susa Nasa
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services , Trinity Food Group, Inc. and Correctional Medical Associates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Magnus v. Cronic et al
as 2:2011cv00152
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Matthew Magnus
Defendant:
Steve Cronic, Hall County Sheriff Department and Trinity Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashe v. Trinity Food Service et al
as 1:2011cv00171
Plaintiff:
Corey C. Ashe
Defendant:
Trinity Food Service and Dekalb County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Sproul et al
as 1:2009cv00185
Plaintiff:
Dominique Treon Henderson
Defendant:
Kelvin Sproul, Lamar Stewart, Ricky Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
