Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Woodall et al v. Enclave MC 46, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
David Woodall, Kathy Woodall and Stanley Woodall
Defendant:
Enclave MC 46, LLC, ATCO Demolition & Grading Services, Inc., Environmental Compliance Consultants, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
O'BRYANT v. SINGHANI INVESTMENT GROUP LLC et al
as 7:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEON O'BRYANT
Defendant:
SINGHANI INVESTMENT GROUP LLC, ONE TRIP INCORPORATED, MANIK NARAIN SINGHANI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dowell v. Quik Trip
as 1:2021cv01489
Defendant:
Quik Trip
Plaintiff:
Lynda Dowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bryant v. Puhl et al
as 1:2016cv03712
Plaintiff:
Hattie Mae Bryant
Defendant:
Todd Puhl, Pamela Monroe, Mark Richts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Quik Trip No. 825 et al
as 1:2012cv02661
Plaintiff:
Melissa Carter
Defendant:
Quik Trip No. 825 and Wells Fargo Bank National Association (INC)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
CCO Zoomer Trip Limited Liability Company v. Racetrac Petroleum, Inc.
as 1:2012cv02344
Plaintiff:
CCO Zoomer Trip Limited Liability Company
Defendant:
Racetrac Petroleum, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Racetrac Petroleum, Inc. v. CCO Zoomer Trip Limited Liability Company
as 1:2009cv02596
Plaintiff:
Racetrac Petroleum, Inc.
Defendant:
CCO Zoomer Trip Limited Liability Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Type:
Other Statutes
Holmes v. Quik Trip Inc.
as 1:2008cv00556
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. Holmes
Defendant:
Quik Trip Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Quik Trip Inc.
as 1:2008mi00038
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. Holmes
Defendant:
Quik Trip Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
