Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Craig v. Quality Correctional Care et al
as 2:2023cv00438
Plaintiff:
Jason R. Craig
Defendant:
Quality Correctional Care, Doe, Trish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00364
Plaintiff:
Virgil Justin Smith
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Corrections, Bruce Lemmon, Ron Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANE v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2010cv00094
Defendant:
MAJOR SAM BEARD, CAPTAIN R. DOGGEN DORF, DIRECTOR RICK ELLIOTT and others
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2010cv00089
Defendant:
MAJOR SAM BEARD, CAPTAIN R. DOGGEN DORF, DIRECTOR RICK ELLIOTT and others
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN LANE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2009cv00061
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN LANE
Defendant:
DANNY RODDEN, RICK ELLIOTT, SAM BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2009cv00031
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN LANE
Defendant:
DANNY RODDEN, RICK ELLIOTT, SAM BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WARMAN v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2008cv00177
Plaintiff:
JASON LEE WARMAN
Defendant:
DANIEL RODDEN, RICK ELLIOTT, SAM BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NEAL v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2008cv00170
Plaintiff:
GARY MIKEL NEAL, JR.
Defendant:
DANIEL RODDEN, RICK ELLIOTT, SAM BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DELEWIS v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2008cv00173
Plaintiff:
STUART AUSTIN DELEWIS
Defendant:
DANIEL RODDEN, RICK ELLIOTT, SAM BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ANCRUM v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2008cv00172
Plaintiff:
DARRELL W ANCRUM, JR.
Defendant:
DANIEL RODDEN, RICK ELLIOTT, SAM BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
