Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Cabrera v. Garza et al
as 6:2017cv00069
Plaintiff:
Louis Alando Cabrera
Defendant:
City of Killeen, District Attorney Henry Garza, Honorable Martha J. Trudo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Polk v. Boyd et. al.
as 6:2016cv00438
Defendant:
Zachary L. Boyd, Fred Burns, John P. Galligan and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Polk, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramon v. Livingston et al
as 1:2016cv00403
Defendant:
David Gutierrez, Stuart Jenkins, Brad Livingston and others
Plaintiff:
Steve Ramon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trudo v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv03422
Plaintiff:
Marshall Trudo, III
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hernandez v. State of Texas Employees, et al
as 6:2012cv00175
Plaintiff:
Maxine Kendrick Hernandez
Defendant:
Mrs. FNU Maryland, State of Texas Employees, Judge Martha Trudo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickinson et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02069
Plaintiff:
William E. Dickinson , Larry . Anderson , Verne R. Anderson and others
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc , Johnson & Johnson Inc and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Johnson v. Trudd
as 6:2009cv00124
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Johnson
Defendant:
Honorable Martha J. Trudo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Trudo et al
as 1:2009cv00310
Petitioner:
Derrick Wayne McDonald
Respondent:
Martha J. Trudo, Michael Waldmayn and Jon Jon McDurmitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
