Cases 11 - 17 of 17
TRUSTMARK NATIONAL BANK v. EB-BAY LOT NO. 2, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00058
Plaintiff:
TRUSTMARK NATIONAL BANK
Defendant:
EB-BAY LOT NO 2 LLC, JOHN G MORRIS, EDWARD E ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dysart v. Trustmark National Bank et al
as 2:2013cv02092
Plaintiff:
Nell C Dysart
Defendant:
Trustmark National Bank , David B Anderson , Deanna L Weidner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Fluker v. M&T Bank et al
as 1:2012cv00309
Plaintiff:
Archie Lee Fluker
Defendant:
M&T Bank, Gerald M. Warren , Michael G. Prestia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Trustmark National Bank et al v. Sanders et al
as 5:2012cv00118
Plaintiff:
Trustmark National Bank and Mark S. Mayfield
Defendant:
Marshall Sanders, Deborah Sanders, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Logan v. Trustmark National Bank
as 2:2011cv04161
Plaintiff:
Courtney Logan
Defendant:
Trustmark National Bank
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2604
Trustmark National Bank v. Edwards Properties, LTD. et al
as 2:2011cv00534
Plaintiff:
Trustmark National Bank
Defendant:
Edwards Properties, LTD. and Lanier J. Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America Upon The Relation And For The Use Of The Tennessee Valley Authority v. Easements and Rights-of-Way over 9.58 acres of land, more or less, in Lowndes County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2008cv00143
Plaintiff:
United States of America Upon The Relation And For The Use Of The Tennessee Valley Authority and United States of America Upon The Relation And For The Use Of The Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant:
Easements and Rights-of-Way over 9.58 acres of land, more or less, in Lowndes County, Mississippi, Trimac Properties, L.P., Trustmark National Bank and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
