Cases 1 - 10 of 295
Taper v. Tabor et al
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Joshua Taper
Defendant:
Jon Tabor, Tammy Shelton, Amber Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Chambers-Smith et al.
as 3:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Shawan M. Johnson
Defendant:
Director Annette Chambers-Smith, Director's Desi B. Turner, Warden Kimberly Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Draper v. Wellpath, LLC et al.
as 4:2023cv02298
Plaintiff:
Timothy Alan Draper
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Nurse Turner, Nurse Van Dyke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. O'Malley et al.
as 1:2023cv01913
Plaintiff:
Donald Sullivan
Defendant:
Michael C. O'Malley, Judge Deborah M. Turner, Judge Wanda C. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Shaw et al
as 4:2023cv00870
Plaintiff:
Joshua Turner
Defendant:
Alan Shaw and Norfolk Southern Train Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FILING ERROR.
as 4:2023cv00854
Plaintiff:
Joshua Turner
Defendant:
Alan Shaw and Norfolk Southern Train Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Bolar
as 4:2023cv00851
Petitioner:
Che Turner
Respondent:
J. Bolar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Turner v. Shaw et al
as 2:2023cv01305
Plaintiff:
Joshua Turner
Defendant:
Alan Shaw and Norfolk Southern Train Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blachere v. Baldwin et al
as 2:2023cv00730
Plaintiff:
Nathanial Colin Blachere
Defendant:
Dallas Baldwin, "John Doe" Turner and "John Doe" Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Garza
as 4:2023cv00040
Petitioner:
Stuart A. Turner
Respondent:
Warden Fernando Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
