Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Grimes v. U S Department of Justice-Kimmela Boyd
as 1:2018cv00092
Petitioner:
Johnathan Lamont Grimes
Respondent:
U S Department of Justice-Kimmela Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Soto v. U S Department of Justice et al
as 5:2015cv00286
Petitioner:
Jose Heriberto Soto
Defendant:
U S Department of Justice, DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION and U S Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Soto v. U S Department of Justice et al
as 6:2015cv00060
Petitioner:
Jose Heriberto Soto
Respondent:
U S Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration and U S Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. Fox et al
as 1:2011cv00016
Plaintiff:
Elijah Jones
Defendant:
John Fox and U S Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Judd v. United States of America et al
as 5:2010cv00240
Plaintiff:
Keith Russell Judd
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Eric Holder, U. S. Attorney General and others
Respondent:
Harley G. Lappin, Federal Bureau of Prisons, U. S. Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Judd v. Holder et al
as 5:2010cv00163
Petitioner:
Keith Russell Judd
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Harley G. Lappin, U S Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dockery v. U S Department Of Justice et al
as 2:2009cv00225
Plaintiff:
Barry C Dockery
Defendant:
U S Department Of Justice, Dan Joslin, Ms Rivers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Narkin v. Physioc, et al
as 3:2009mc00004
Plaintiff:
Paul I Narkin
Defendant:
Philip S Physioc, Tom Hoard, Fred C Wright, III and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00106
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00100
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
