Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Hughes v. U.S. Attorney General, et al
as 11-1106
Petitioner - Appellant:
DENYS RAY HUGHES
Respondent - Appellee:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al, RENE GARCIA, U.S. DISTRICT COURT, et al and others
Barbour v. U.S. Attorney General
as 11-1102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Allen v. U.S. Attorney General's Office, et al
as 11-1053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GENE ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE, et al., OFFICE OF DETENTION AND REMOVAL OPERATIONS and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Demos, Jr. v. United States, et al
as 10-7032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF WASHINGTON, TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA and others
Bauer v. U.S. Attorney General
as 10-1027
Petitioner - Appellant:
FREDERICK W. BAUER
Respondent - Appellee:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Twitty v. Wiley, et al
as 09-1009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE J. TWITTY
Defendant - Appellee:
RONNIE WILEY, Warden FLM Max BOP, MIKE NALLEY, Regional Dir. BOP, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director BOP and others
Demos, Jr. v. U.S. Attorney General, et al
as 08-1457
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, GOVERNOR OF COLORADO and GOVERNOR OF WASHINGTON STATE, et al.
Gomis v. U.S. State Secret, et al
as 08-1352
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTOINE GOMIS
Respondent - Appellee:
U.S. STATE SECRET, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, DHS SECRETARY and others
Guel-Sauceda v. Mukasey
as 08-9524
Petitioner:
HECTOR GUEL-SAUCEDA
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, U.S. Attorney General
Chavez v. United States Sent., et al
as 07-1323
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN LOPEZ CHAVEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION, [sic] Washington, D.C., KENNETH P. COHEN, United States Commission Washington, D.C., JUDGE, DISTRICT COURT OF WELD COUNTY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
