Cases 1 - 10 of 11
SAMPSON v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
as 1:2023cv01373
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE C. SAMPSON, SR.
Defendant:
U.S. ARMY and DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROOKS v. U.S. ARMY 1ST INFORMATION OPERATIONS COMMAND et al
as 1:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO GREGORY BROOKS
Defendant:
U.S. ARMY 1ST INFORMATION OPERATIONS COMMAND, DEFENSE COUNTERINTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY AGENCY, U.S. ARMY COUNTERINTELLIGENCE COMMAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
CARNES v. U.S. ARMY et al
as 1:2022cv02520
Plaintiff:
LISA KAREN MARIE CARNES
Defendant:
U.S. ARMY, ARMY RESEARCH, FORT BLISS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RUSHING vs. U.S. ARMY et al
as 1:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
SHAUN RUSHING
Defendant:
U.S. ARMY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RUSHING vs. U.S. ARMY
as 1:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
SHAUN RUSHING
Defendant:
U.S. ARMY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. U.S. ARMY et al
as 1:2020cv03570
Defendant:
U.S. ARMY, HERBERT GASKINS, U.S. MARINES and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE P. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CONLON v. CIA et al
as 1:2020cv02237
Defendant:
PENTAGON, DOD, U.S. ARMY and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN M. CONLON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURROUGHS v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2019cv01700
Defendant:
FBI, U.S. ARMY, CIA and others
Plaintiff:
DARLENE MIRANDA BURROUGHS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IRVIN, SR. v. AFTERMATH ENTERTAINMENT et al
as 1:2017cv02145
Defendant:
AFTERMATH ENTERTAINMENT, SHADY RECORDS, INTERSCOPE RECORDS and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW IRVIN, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
PORTERFIELD v. U.S. ARMY
as 1:2016cv01343
Plaintiff:
DEMIKA PORTERFIELD
Defendant:
U.S. ARMY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
