Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Save The Colorado, et al v. Spellmon, et al
as 21-1155
Petitioner / Appellant:
LIVING RIVERS, a nonprofit corporation, THE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, a Colorado nonprofit corporation, SAVE THE COLORADO, a Colorado nonprofit corporation and others
Respondent / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT GENERAL SCOTT A SPELLMON, in his official capacity as the Chief of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as the Principal Deputy Director, exercising the authority of Acting Director of the U.S. Fish and WIldlife Service and DEBRA HAALAND, in her offical capacity as Secretary of the Interior
Intervenor / Appellee:
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, acting by and through its Board of Water Commissioners (Denver Water)
State of Colorado v. EPA, et al
as 20-1263
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Defendant:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ANDREW WHEELER, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor Defendant:
CHANTELL SACKETT and MICHAEL SACKETT
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE STATE OF COLORADO
Amicus Curiae:
NEW MEXICO ACEQUIA ASSOCIATION, NAVAJO NATION, GILA RESOURCES INFORMATION PROJECT and others
Petitioner:
INSTITUTE FOR POLICY INTEGRITY AT NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW and THE INSTITUTE FOR POLICY INTEGRITY AT NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW
State of Colorado v. EPA, et al
as 20-1262
Intervenor Defendant:
NATIONAL STONE, SAND, AND GRAVEL ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS and others
Defendant:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ANDREW WHEELER, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE STATE OF COLORADO
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
CHANTELL SACKETT and MICHAEL SACKETT
Amicus Curiae:
NEW MEXICO ACEQUIA ASSOCIATION, NAVAJO NATION, GILA RESOURCES INFORMATION PROJECT and others
Petitioner:
INSTITUTE FOR POLICY INTEGRITY AT NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW and THE INSTITUTE FOR POLICY INTEGRITY AT NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW
State of Colorado v. EPA, et al
as 20-1238
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW WHEELER, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, R.D. JAMES, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE STATE OF COLORADO
Amicus Curiae:
NEW MEXICO ACEQUIA ASSOCIATION, NAVAJO NATION, INSTITUTE FOR POLICY INTEGRITY AT NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW and others
Intervenor Defendant:
U.S. POULTRY & EGG ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS, LEADING BUILDERS OF AMERICA and others
Petitioner:
MICHAEL SACKETT, CHANTELL SACKETT and THE INSTITUTE FOR POLICY INTEGRITY AT NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW
Sierra Club, et al v. Bostick, et al
as 14-6099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIERRA CLUB, INC., CLEAN ENERGY FUTURE OKLAHOMA and EAST TEXAS SUB REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS P. BOSTICK, in his official capacity as Commanding General and Chief of Engineers of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, MICHAEL J. WALSH, in his official capacity as U.S. Army Commanding General for Civil and Emergency Operations, MICHAEL TEAGUE, in his official capacity as Tulsa District Commander of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
TRANSCANADA KEYSTONE PIPELINE LP, TRANSCANADA CORPORATION, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION and others
Sierra Club, et al v. Bostick, et al
as 12-6201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIERRA CLUB, INC., CLEAN ENERGY FUTURE OKLAHOMA and EAST TEXAS SUB REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS P. BOSTICK, in his official capacity as Commanding General and Chief of Engineers of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, MICHAEL J. WALSH, in his official capacity as U.S. Army Commanding General for Civil and Emergency Operations, MICHAEL TEAGUE, in his official capacity as Tulsa District Commander of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor:
TRANSCANADA KEYSTONE PIPELINE LP, TRANSCANADA CORPORATION, INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION and others
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineer
as 11-7016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, Ex rel, United States of America
Union Pacific Railroad v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
as 08-7102
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, Ex rel, United States of America
State of Utah, et al v. United States, et al
as 06-4062
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF UTAH
Plaintiff-Intervenor - Appellee:
NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY, GREAT SALT LAKE AUDUBON, UTAH COUNCIL OF TROUT UNLIMITED and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BLM, BLM, THE UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CLINGER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP
Rio Grande, et al v. Martinez, et al
as 05-2399
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RIO GRANDE SILVERY MINNOW, Hybognathus amarus, SOUTHWESTERN WILLOW FLYCATCHER, (Empidonax trailii extimus), DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, an agency of the United States, ROBERT L. VAN ANTWERP, Lt. Gen., Chief Engineer, Army Corps of Engineers, JOSEPH BALLARD, General, Chief Engineer, Army Corps of Engineers and others
Defendant-Intervenor - Appellant:
THE MIDDLE RIO GRANDE CONSERVANCY DISTRICT
Defendant-Intervenor:
STATE OF NEW MEXICO, RIO DE CHAMA ACEQUIA ASSOCIATION and CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE
Defendant-Intervenor - Appellee:
ALBUQUERQUE-BERNALILLO COUNTY WATER UTILITY AUTHORITY
Intervenor:
CITY OF SANTA FE
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF ARIZONA, CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
