Cases 41 - 50 of 188
Jones et al v. Ditech Financial, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00015
Plaintiff:
Rodreka Jones as Personal Representative of the estate of Nathaniel Griffin, Sr. , Rodreka Jones and Franchesca Ross
Defendant:
Ditech Financial, LLC and U.S. Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sallye v. U.S. Bank N.A.
as 8:2017cv02877
Plaintiff:
Brenda Sallye
Defendant:
U.S. Bank N.A.
Mediator:
Peter J. Grilli
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Fleming v. U.S. Bank N.A.
as 0:2017cv62077
Plaintiff:
Keith Fleming
Defendant:
U.S. Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Hoti et al
as 9:2017cv81060
Plaintiff:
Bank of America, N.A and U.S. Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Skender Hoti, Beba Hoti and Unknown Spouse of Glen Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Phillips v. Davis et al
as 8:2017cv01737
Plaintiff:
Judge Thomas Phillips, III
Defendant:
Richard Davis, Comptroller of Currency, Security Exchange Commissioner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv01652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Phillips v. Davis et al
as 8:2017mc00064
Petitioner:
Thomas Phillips, III
Respondent:
Richard Davis , Hillsborough County Clerk of Courts, Comptroller of Currency and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Hernandez v. OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 9:2017cv80525
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Ford Hernandez
Defendant:
OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC and U.S. Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Tobin et al
as 1:2017cv01323
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Donna Sparks Tobin, Stephen L. Tobin and Household Realty Corporation
Podrug v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
as 3:2017cv00352
Plaintiff:
Armin Podrug
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
