Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Reevis v. Spokane County Superior Court et al
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
Spokane County Superior Court, Supreme Court United States and U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Manning et al v. Barr et al
as 3:2021cv05308
Plaintiff:
Peter Manning and Aaron Barfield
Defendant:
Liquor and Cannabis Board of the State of Washington, Jane Rushford, William P Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Reevis v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 2:2021cv00013
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reevis v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 2:2020cv00484
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reevis v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 2:2020cv00483
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00775
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2019cv01874
Plaintiff:
Department of Homeland Security and Karan PAL
Defendant:
USCIS and U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01549
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Francis et al v. US Department of Justice
as 2:2019cv01317
Plaintiff:
Knight First Amendment Institute, Megan Ming Francis, Hiroshi Motomura and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice and US Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
