Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Seneca Re-Ad Indust, Inc. v. Sec of the DOL, et al
as 24-3191
Plaintiff:
SENECA RE-AD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
ACTING SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Julie A. Su and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Intervenor:
RALPH MAGERS, PAMELA STEWARD and MARK FELTON
Shannon Gladden v. U.S. Department of Labor Administrative Review Boa
as 23-12133
Petitioner:
SHANNON GLADDEN
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Jerome Yelder v. U.S. Department of Labor, ARB
as 21-3857
Petitioner:
JEROME YELDER
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Norfolk Southern Railway Co v. U.S. Department of Labor, ARB
as 21-3369
Petitioner:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Intervenor:
SCOTTY LANCASTER
Amicus Curiae:
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS
Weatherford U.S., L.P. v. U.S. Department of Labor, ARB
as 21-3282
Petitioner:
WEATHERFORD U.S., L.P.
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Estate of Daniel A. Ayres v. U.S. Department of Labor, ARB
as 21-3017
Petitioner:
ESTATE OF DANIEL A. AYRES, by Kimberly Ayres, Administrator
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Weatherford U.S., L.P. v. U.S. Department of Labor, ARB
as 20-4342
Petitioner:
WEATHERFORD U.S., L.P.
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Grand Trunk Western Railroad v. DOL
as 17-3083
Petitioner:
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Administrative Review Board
BNSF Railway Co. v. LABR
as 16-3093
Petitioner:
BNSF Railway Company
Respondent:
U.S. Department of Labor, Administrative Review Board
James Green v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad, et al
as 15-1760
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES GREEN
Respondent - Appellee:
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN RAILROAD INC. and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Administrative Review Board
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
