Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Phi Health, LLC et al v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Phi Health, LLC and Empact Midwest, LLC
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, U.S. Office of Personnel Management and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Donald v. Centrus Energy et al
as 5:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Minnie Aline Donald
Defendant:
Centrus Energy, Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. and U.S. Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houston v. U.S. Department of Labor, Employment Standards Administration, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, Division of Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation, Final Adjudication Branch
as 5:2016cv00113
Plaintiff:
David Houston
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Labor, Employment Standards Administration, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, Division of Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation, Final Adjudication Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7384
Stone v. U.S. Department of Labor, Employment Standards Administration, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, Division of Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation, Final Adjudication Branch et al
as 5:2015cv00250
Plaintiff:
Charles Stone
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Labor, Employment Standards Administration, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, Division of Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation, Final Adjudication Branch and Secretary of Labor Thomas E. Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lahndorff v. U.S. Department of Labor
as 5:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
Gregory K. Lahndorff
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7384
Berry v. U.S. Department of Labor
as 5:2014cv00228
Plaintiff:
Clarence S. Berry
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7384
Lanier et al v. U.S. Department of Labor, Employment Standards Administration, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, Division of Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation, Final Adjudication Branch
as 5:2014cv00168
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Lanier , Kathy L. Cherry , Rose M. Gough and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Labor, Employment Standards Administration, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, Division of Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation, Final Adjudication Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7384
Allen v. U.S. Department of Labor, Employment Standards Administration, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, Division of Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation, Final Adjudication Branch
as 5:2014cv00163
Plaintiff:
Dolores Allen
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Labor, Employment Standards Administration, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, Division of Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation, Final Adjudication Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7384
Jeffords v. U.S. Department of Labor, Employment Standards Administration, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, Division of Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation, Final Adjudication Branch
as 5:2014cv00165
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Jeffords
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Labor, Employment Standards Administration, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, Division of Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation, Final Adjudication Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7384
Todd v. U.S. Department of Labor, Employment Standards Administration, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, Division of Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation, Final Adjudication Branch
as 5:2014cv00164
Plaintiff:
Nettie M. Todd
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Labor, Employment Standards Administration, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, Division of Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation, Final Adjudication Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7384
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
