Cases 11 - 18 of 18
State of California, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 18-15255
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF DELAWARE, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ALEX M. AZAR II, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor and others
Wright v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2017cv01451
Plaintiff:
Roderic Mack Wright
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Department of the Treasury
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Reedom v. Social Security et al
as 1:2015cv00005
Plaintiff:
James Patrick Reedom
Defendant:
Social Security, USDA and U.S. Department of the Treasury
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Huene v. U.S. Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2011cv02110
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Huene
Defendant:
U.S. Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service and Anthony Shelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huene v. U.S. Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2011cv01306
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Huene
Defendant:
U.S. Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service and Anthony Shelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Huene v. U.S. Department of the Treasury et al
as 1:2011cv00920
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Huene
Defendant:
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Siu Chan and Anthony Shelley
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Huene v. U.S. Department of the Treasury et al
as 2:2011cv02109
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Huene
Defendant:
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Siu Chan and Anthony Shelley
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Banister v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, et al
as 5:2010cv02764
Plaintiff:
Joseph R. Banister
Defendant:
U.S. Department of the Treasury, and Timothy F. Geithner
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
