Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Brodeur v. U.S. Government
as 3:2024cv00824
Petitioner:
Christopher Xavier Brodeur
Respondent:
U.S. Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brodeur v. The U.S. Government
as 9:2024cv00604
Petitioner:
Christopher Xavier Brodeur
Respondent:
The U.S. Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. The State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2023cv00564
Petitioner:
Detrick Dwayne Harris
Respondent:
The State of Mississippi and U.S. Government Agency; Namely, Mississippi Public Utilities Staff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diarra v. U.S. Government
as 1:2021cv07498
Petitioner:
Moussa Diarra
Respondent:
U.S. Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Tapp v. The U.S. Government et al
as 9:2020cv01574
Defendant:
The U.S. Government and The U.S. Governor John Doe
Plaintiff:
Sean Tapp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graves v. U.S. Government et al
as 1:2020cv05111
Defendant:
Dr. Seltzer, Mid Hudson, U.S. Government and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Graves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ardaneh v. U.S. Government et al
as 1:2020cv03450
Defendant:
Evaluator Sara Laniado, Clerk of the Brockton District Court, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Hamid Reza Ardaneh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moshir v. Captain Conley et al
as 1:2017cv00525
Plaintiff:
Ali Moshir
Defendant:
Captain Conley, United States Marshal, Warden Larose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv07517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Larios v. U.S. Government and his Religion
as 1:2015cv03239
Plaintiff:
Edgar Antonio Marquez Larios
Defendant:
U.S. Government and his Religion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
