Cases 1 - 10 of 15
QUINN v. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2022cv02525
Plaintiff:
ANDREW QUINN
Defendant:
JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, ARLINGTON COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE, ARLINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BLACKBURN v. U.S. MARSHALS
as 1:2021cv03303
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY TYRON BLACKBURN
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DON'T SHOOT PORTLAND et al v. WOLF et al
as 1:2020cv02040
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIA HESTER, DANIALLE JAMES, BEVERLEY BARNUM and others
Defendant:
L. ERIC PATTERSON, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE, DONALD W. WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
STEVENSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2019cv00972
Plaintiff:
TREY OSHAE STEVENSON
Defendant:
UNKNOWN U.S. MARSHAL, UNKNOWN MPD EMPLOYEES, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. DIRECTOR, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE
as 1:2019cv00649
Defendant:
DIRECTOR, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE
Plaintiff:
DIANNE MICHELE CARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv00202
Plaintiff:
DONYA WILLIAMS and J.W.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOHN DOE U.S. MARSHALS 1-6
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
EALY v. BARRETT et al
as 1:2014cv02208
Plaintiff:
LANCE Q. EALY
Defendant:
MICHAEL BARRETT and U.S. MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HIGGINS v. U.S. MARSHAL
as 1:2014cv01776
Plaintiff:
PAULETTA HIGGINS
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DASTMALCHIAN v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2014cv00594
Plaintiff:
SHABNAM DASTMALCHIAN
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. MARSHAL SERVICES, ANTHONY MOSELEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAW v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2012cv00538
Plaintiff:
PATTI HAMMOND SHAW
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, BENJAMIN E. KATES, STEVE CONBOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
