Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Akers v. Shute, et al
as 11-3112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL SHUTE, U.S. Marshal Supervisor, CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, U.S. Marshal Deputy, KIM I. MARTIN, Assistant U.S. Attorney, AKA Kim M. Berger, AKA Kim M. Fowler and others
Wilson v. U.S. Marshal Service
as 1:2011cv00079
Petitioner:
Carl L. Wilson
Respondent:
U.S. Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reed v. Six, et al
as 10-3334
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROGER LEE REED
Respondent - Appellee:
STEPHEN SIX, Attorney General of the State of Kansas, BUREAU OF PRISONS, RONALD W. RIKER, Designation & Sentence Computation Center and others
Knox v. Aldridge, et al
as 10-7035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA ALDRIDGE, D & E Unit Manager, OSP, AMY THOMAS, D Unit Case Manager, OSP, BRIAN HOLDEN, D Unit Mental Health Officer, OSP and others
Cook v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2009cv02967
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Ray Cook
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons and U.S. Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Zani v. U.S. Marshals, et al
as 09-4107
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT JOSEPH ZANI
Respondent - Appellee:
U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE, SALT LAKE CITY and TEXAS BOARD OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
Zani v. U.S. Marshals Service, et al
as 09-1110
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT JOSEPH ZANI
Respondent - Appellee:
U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE, Denver and TEXAS BOARD OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, Huntsville
Zani v. U.S. Marshals Service et al
as 1:2009cv00052
Petitioner:
Robert Joseph Zani
Respondent:
U.S. Marshals Service and Texas Board of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Garcia v. U.S. Marshals et al
as 1:2008cv00013
Plaintiff:
Phillip Angel Garcia
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals, Board of County Commissioners for Sandoval County and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
