Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bullock v. Woosley et al
as 4:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Bullock
Defendant:
Jason Woosley, Ted Rogers, Robbie Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mobley v. Woosley et al
as 4:2021cv00109
Petitioner:
Kenneth Mobley
Respondent:
Jason Woosley, U.S. Marshal Services, Grayson Co Dept Cor. and others
Not Classified By Court:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thorson v. United States of America et al
as 4:2018cv00052
Petitioner:
Corey A. Thorson
Defendant:
United States of America and U.S. Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Williams v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2017cv00447
Petitioner:
Ulysses Williams
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and U.S. Marshal Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. U.S. Marshal Service et al
as 4:2016cv00005
Plaintiff:
Earnest Otto Smith
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Service, Grayson County Detention Center, Assistant U.S Attorney David Wieser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Essex v. U.S. Marshal Service for the Eastern District of Kentucky et al.
as 5:2015cv00279
Plaintiff:
John Michael Essex
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Service for the Eastern District of Kentucky , Roger Daniel , Jacob M. Frick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Harris v. U.S. Marshal Service
as 6:2015cv00099
Petitioner:
Christopher Harris
Respondent:
U.S. Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Adams v. Ballard et al
as 5:2013cv00124
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Adams, Jr.
Defendant:
Rodney Ballard, Fayette County Detention Center, Gary Blair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zani v. U.S. Marshals Service et al
as 3:2008cv00333
Petitioner:
Robert Joseph Zani
Respondent:
U.S. Marshals Service and Texas Board of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
