Cases 11 - 20 of 29
National Labor Relations Board v. U.S. Postal Service
as 3:2017mc00003
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
U.S. Postal Service
NLRB v. U.S. Postal Service
as 16-2074
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
Interested Party:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER CARRIERS, BRANCH 826, AFL-CIO
Rodriguez-Robles et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2016cv01212
Plaintiff:
Esmeralda Rodriguez-Robles and E.C.R.
Defendant:
United States of America and U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
NLRB v. U.S. Postal Service
as 11-1225
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-2348
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Calderon-Lopez v. Comision Estatal de Elecciones, et al
as 10-1579
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICARDO J. CALDERON-LOPEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
COMISION ESTATAL DE ELECCIONES, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, COMPTROLLER, OF THE CURRENCY and others
Calderon-Lopez v. Comision Estatal, et al
as 10-1573
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICARDO J. CALDERON-LOPEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
COMISION ESTATAL DE ELECCIONES, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, COMPTROLLER, OF THE CURRENCY and others
Fucile et al
as 3:2009cv01962
Plaintiff:
Michael Fucile, Angela E. Nelson and United States of America (U.S. Postal Service)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Cooperativa de Seguros Multipl, et al v. US, et al
as 09-2244
Plaintiff:
ANGEL PALMER-FERRER, MIRTA MARRERO-PALMER, JOSE ANGEL PALMER-MARRERO and others
Defendant - Appellant:
COOPERATIVA DE SEGUROS MULTIPLES
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
