Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 11 - 20 of 25
KING v. PADULA et al
as 3:2017cv05443
Plaintiff: TANYA KING
Defendant: MICHAEL A. PADULA, U.S. POSTAL SERVICE AT NEPTUNE NEW JERSEY, POSTAL DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv06855
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WALSH et al v. AINBINDER et al
as 3:2014cv05901
Plaintiff: JAMES WALSH and NEW JERSEY COMMERCIAL CLEANING SERVICE
Defendant: MATT AINBINDER and U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GEICO v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2014cv02930
Plaintiff: GEICO
Defendant: U.S. POSTAL SERVICE and ASHOK PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CASTORAN v. POLLAK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv02531
Plaintiff: F. PAULA CASTORAN
Defendant: SCOTT M. POLLAK, JOHN DOE(S) NORTHFIELD POLICE OFFICERS, ROBERT JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARMSTRONG v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv05567
Plaintiff: ANDREW ARMSTRONG
Defendant: U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03093
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
LAWTON et al v. DZURISIN et al
as 3:2012cv00775
Plaintiff: JEFFREY LAWTON and CARYN LAWTON
Defendant: ANDREW DZURISIN, U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01871
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
TULKO v. U.S.Postal Service We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv02451
Plaintiff: ANITA J. TULKO
Defendant: U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?