Cases 1 - 10 of 29
RISENHOOVER v. SHUI-BIAN et al
as 1:2023cv01341
Plaintiff:
PAUL MAAS RISENHOOVER
Defendant:
CHEN SHUI-BIAN, STEPHEN YOUNG, CLIFFORD HART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEMOS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv02385
Defendant:
U.S. MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX, U.S. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, NATIONAL SECURITY DIRECTOR and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. DEMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brud Rossmann v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 11-5249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Brud Rossmann
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., U.S. Attorney General, United States Department of Defense, Robert M. Gates, U.S. Secretary of Defense and others
In re: Vincent Rivera
as 10-5329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Vincent Faustino Rivera
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert M. Gates, U.S. Secretary of Defense, Barack Obama, President, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Vice President and others
Ammar Al-Baluchi v. Robert Gates
as 08-1236
Petitioner:
Ammar Al-Baluchi, also known as Ali Abdul Aziz Ali
Respondent:
Robert M. Gates, U.S. Secretary of Defense
Ahmed Ghailani v. Robert Gates
as 08-1209
Petitioner:
Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani
Respondent:
Robert M. Gates, U.S. Secretary of Defense
Ahmed Ahjam v. Robert Gates
as 08-1207
Petitioner:
Ahmed Adnan Ahjam, also known as Abu Rawda
Respondent:
Robert M. Gates, U.S. Secretary of Defense
Sharifullah, et al v. Robert Gates
as 08-1198
Petitioner:
Sharifullah and Subhanullah, as Next Friend
Respondent:
Robert M. Gates, U.S. Secretary of Defense
Hassan Said, et al v. Robert Gates
as 08-1183
Petitioner:
Hassan Abdul Said and Sami Al Hajj, as Next Friend
Respondent:
Robert M. Gates, U.S. Secretary of Defense
Mohamed Abdulmalik, et al v. Robert Gates
as 08-1130
Petitioner:
Mohamed Abdulmalik and Salim Juma Khamisi, as Next Friend
Respondent:
Robert M. Gates, U.S. Secretary of Defense
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
