Cases
Tohono O'odham Nation, et al. v. United States Department of the Interior, et al.
as 24-2778
Plaintiff: TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION, SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE, ARCHAEOLOGY SOUTHWEST and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of Interior and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Intervenor: SUNZIA TRANSMISSION, LLC
California Valley Miwok Tribe, et al v. Ryan Zinke, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-16321
Plaintiff - Appellant: CALIFORNIA VALLEY MIWOK TRIBE, ANJELICA PAULK, SILVIA BURLEY and others
Defendant - Appellee: RYAN K. ZINKE, in his official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Interior, MICHAEL BLACK, in his official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary of Interior-Indian Affairs and WELDON LOUDERMILK, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: CALIFORNIA VALLEY MIWOK TRIBE, CALIFORNIA VALLEY MIWOK TRIBE TRIBAL COUNCIL, YAKIMA DIXIE and others
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. Pizarchik, et al
as 12-1200
Plaintiff - Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DINE CITIZENS AGAINST RUINING OUR ENVIRONMENT and SAN JUAN CITIZENS ALLIANCE
Defendant - Appellee: JOSEPH PIZARCHIK, in his official capacity as Director, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, WESTERN REGION OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Interior and KEN SALAZAR, in his official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Interior
Defendant-Intervenor - Appellee: BHP NAVAJO COAL COMPANY and NAVAJO NATION
Demos v. United States Attorney General et al
as 5:2010cv00063
Plaintiff: John Robert Demos, Jr.
Defendant: United States Attorney General, President of the United States of America, U.S. Secretary of the Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?