Cases 1 - 9 of 9
DURNELL v. U.S. XPRESS INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DURNELL
Defendant:
U.S. XPRESS INC., U.S. XPRESS LEASING INC., U.S. XPRESS ENTERPRISES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DIGIGLIO et al v. U.S. XPRESS ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01039
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DIGIGLIO and DORSON HESS
Defendant:
U.S. XPRESS ENTERPRISES, INC., PRATT INDUSTRIES, INC., WAYNE OSBORNE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
DANESE et al v. BENOTT et al
as 2:2016cv02583
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DANESE and LORRAINE DANESE
Defendant:
KENNETH BENOTT , U.S. XPRESS ENTERPRISES, INC. , DAIMLER TRUST and others
Movant:
U.S. XPRESS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RAMPINO v. U.S. XPRESS, INC. et al
as 3:2016cv02171
Plaintiff:
CAMILLE RAMPINO
Defendant:
U.S. XPRESS, INC. , U.S. XPRESS ENTERPRISES, INC. , JOHN DOES #1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DRUNKOVSKIS v. MEAUX et al
as 3:2014cv06112
Plaintiff:
LAIMONIS DRUNKOVSKIS
Defendant:
LEONARD G. MEAUX, U.S. XPRESS ENTERPRISES, INC. , US XPRESS LEASING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LEGOWSKI v. GEORGE et al
as 2:2010cv00177
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LEGOWSKI
Defendant:
SAMUEL STEWART GEORGE, U.S. XPRESS LEASING, INC., U.S. XPRESS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
White v. Wheeler et al
as 4:2008cv00059
Plaintiff:
Sherman White
Defendant:
David Ross Wheeler, U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc., U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
King v. Purvis et al
as 3:2007cv00862
Plaintiff:
William B. King
Defendant:
Kimberlee Purvis, U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. and U.S. Xpress, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
